Do you understand the phobia cure or rewind technique
How does the rewind technique really work?
I remember when I attended my HG rewind training and Joe and
he said “we have taken the phobia cure used in NLP and improved it” (or
something to that effect). He said “what was missing was the creating the
correct state first and the technique should only be performed once a person is
in a state of deep relaxation”. In
hypnotic terms you could also create a ‘safe place’ and ensure the person is in
or can access that safe place easily.
This made me think more about my NLP training and how this
compares to my HG training of this technique. Suddenly it came to me that Richard
Bandler describes it as a process and states “People misunderstand NLP and see
it as a series of techniques when actually it is an attitude of tenacity and
curiosity from which a methodology has been built and from that techniques have
been developed. Techiques are a test or application of the attitude and
methodology, they are NOT NLP!!”
Tonight I saw a client with long-term anxiety and “deep-seated
phobias” as he called them. He had seen ‘many therapists’ without any success
and had been given my name. He told me he’d even bought a ‘Phobia cure CD’
which used the ‘fast phobia cure’ but it didn’t work!!! I must admit I was
curious as to what ‘work’ meant or if your are interested in David Grove’s work
on metaphor “what kind of work is work?”
It was quite clear he had built a black and white
expectation of therapeutic interventions whereby they either ‘work’ or don’t
against a very tight criteria so recalibrating his criteria was my first focus.
Anyway back to the REWIND technique… The key points are
association / disassociation, state creation, and using what is presented by
the client. Richard Bandler first developed the process following interviewing
people who had naturally overcome their fears and phobias without therapeutic
intervention and then tested his findings. His key areas of interest in NLP are
state creation and sub-modalities (qualities of sensory experience); he always
puts people in the states best for them and works with their sensory evidence
(sub-modalities). Hold this thought…
So back to the client. As we discussed his expectation and
experiences he mentioned more acceptance of science than faith and that he was
interested in astral projection although it hadn’t worked for him. I added YET
to the statement and continued with recalibrating expectations. From there I
put him into a trance (deep state of relaxation) and asked him to float free
from his body that is safe in the comfortable chair and to turn to observe his
deeply relaxed and safe self . The way I presented this was actually a
disassociated state!! Next I took him to what had previously been considered a
danger place and gave him the ability to ‘phaze in and out’ of the experience
so he could experience and then observe. After we had finished he said the observer
position was behind glass in a control room where he could take notes and
experiment with the experience by stepping in and out of it.
Hopefully you can see this is a rework of the REWIND technique
to suit the clients reference experiences and I was able to make this shift in
application as I understand the design. Once you review the original work of
Richard Bandler, and adjustments by Joe, you will be able to rework yo suit virtually
any client with phobias, anxiety, PTSD and more.
If you have any questions please contact me
Comments
Post a Comment